THE IMPACT OF THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS ON HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN THE NIGERIAN BANKING SECTOR
THE IMPACT
OF THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS ON HUMAN
RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT IN THE NIGERIAN BANKING SECTOR
ANDAH, R.A.[1],
KWON-DUNG, LINDA[2]
&
BATURE, NANA[3]
Abstract
The current global financial crisis which has engulfed East Asia since
July 1997 and subsequently spread to Russia, Brazil, Africa and indeed Nigeria
is one of the most pressing challenges facing countries and businesses in
today’s global business environment. This is the first true crisis. Globalization represents the structural
making of the world characterized by the free flow of technology and human
resources across national boundaries. This paper examines the impact of this
global financial crisis on the financial sector with specific reference to the
banking sector. And the ability of the human resource managers to deal with the
issue of staff layoffs which has been a major challenge to various
organizations especially the banking sector of the economy. Pension payment has
become a huge source of worry because of the dwindling finances to meet up with
the financial obligations of recurrent expenditure, job cuts, layoffs and
increased unemployment has become a great challenge of the crisis. Measures that help workers cope with the
crisis in the sector would serve social and economic goals. These include
adequate, well-designed unemployment benefits and social protection, activation
policies and effective public employment services.
Introduction
Economic crisis is a situation in which an economy
witnesses slowdown of economic activities ,increased level of unemployment,
decreased consumer spending, low level of investment, low level of trading
activities , and the loss of value of assets by a segment of the financial
institutions which persists over a period of time . Today’s disastrous
financial and economic problems had its origin in a steep contradictions in credit full effect of which started to be felt in august 2007 (Aluko, 2000).
During these periods of economic crises, workers put their future security and
welfare over and above doing their jobs as prescribed by the organizations
procedural handbooks. Therefore managers of human resources should have it at
the back of their minds that they are dealing with employees that are
confronted with high emotions, low morale, curiosity, anxiety, and possible
loss of life savings, losing their houses, apprehension and near state of
hopelessness because of the fear of the unknown over the sustainability of
their gratuities and pension. All these leads to increased rumour mongering
accentuated stressed levels, irritability, decreased productivity, cutting of
corners and hidden health costs to the organization.
Further more the importance of human resource management in
an organization cannot be over emphasized; this is because it plays a strategic
role in the success of an organization.
Human resources management witnessed its major development as a
profession at the end of world war 11 and the early 1990s (Alaibe, 2002).The
world of work in which human resource might operate has changed dramatically in
the last few years, this dynamics which exist in the market environment and the
financial sector both locally and globally is what this paper will focus on.
Human capital management in it's entirely is that of improving how
organizations employ, deploy and evaluate their workforce. Similarly the focus
of human resource manager is on the development of its human capital within the
banking industry.
Youndit (2000) opined that, since organizations are
undergoing fundamental shifts in the ways they conduct business; effective
organizations must however view the above thrust seriously. To survive in an
environment where, all provide almost the same products and services, the
quality of the human element is a major factor. Unfortunately, most
organizations underrate and devalue the need to develop human capital. Some
view the development of human capital as a loosely designed classroom training
program. Others make use of training and development schemes as a means of
settling scores between expectations and organizational values. Training and
development programmes have been carried out in some quarters without the
corporate strategically set objectives. Today’s banks operate in a keenly
competitive arena. Knowledge and information fuel the engine. Today’s banks are
knowledge-based. They are designed to process ideas, experiences and
information. Similarly their methods must change to meet with this new strategy.
Fajana (2002) puts it, inmost of today's organizations, the
ability to learn and change faster than the competitor is the key to survival.
According to him, the pace of product, technology and market changes will
continue to accelerate with most Banks becoming nimble, flexible and responsive
to their customers' needs of the current
crisis. Similarly, from 1996 to 2005, the United States and European insurance
markets doubled in size; the corresponding growth in Asia was only 8%, mainly
as a result of Japan’s financial stagnation over the period. The Chinese and
Indian insurance sectors were also beginning to expand significantly; while
Australia’s large financial groups were expected to improve their share of the
region’s market.
The EU27 financial services sector employed 5.6 million
people in 2006, with banking and insurance accounting for 75% and 20%
respectively. Five per cent of financial services workers are employed with
other financial intermediaries. The sector represented 2.7% of total employment
in the EU27, a much smaller employment share than that of the US, where the
share was 4.7% of total employment, representing 4.1 million workers, 44% of
whom were in banking and the rest in insurance and associated services.
Financial services employment expansion has been slow, with overall EU27 growth
at only 0.5% between 1996 and 2006. To put this into perspective, the increase
of total employment of other services sectors during the period was 3%.
The reason for this disparity in growth is explained in
large measure by extensive mergers and acquisitions leading to consolidation
and restructuring of the financial services sector as firms sought economies of
scale and scope to increase their productivity and ability to compete on
regional and global markets. The share of financial services in overall
employment varies among countries. In the United Kingdom the sector enjoys a
pre-eminent status, with 4.8% of national employment. The Netherlands is second
with 3.9%, while Germany’s and France’s finance sectors each have a 3.4% share.
Luxembourg is a special case, with a very large financial services sector
relative to national employment (11.9%).
Together the financial services jobs of France, Germany,
Italy, the Netherlands, Spain and the United Kingdom account for about 75% of
the EU27 financial services workforce. The United States financial services
sector comprises banking; insurance; and securities, commodities and other
investments. In 2006 the sector employed approximately 8.363 million workers,
distributed as follows: about 1.825 million in banking; roughly 2.3 million in
insurance and 0.816 million in securities, commodities and other investments,
and the balance in real-estate-related activities. Office and administrative
support workers constitute 2 out of 3 banking jobs. In this paper, the
challenges of the crisis to human resources management are qualitatively
examined.
Globalization and the
Financial Crisis
The financial industry used to be highly regulated and
compartmentalized even within countries. Following changes made possible by
advances in IT and spectacular trade expansion resulting from commitments on
market access and national treatment for non-national businesses under the
World Trade Organization’s General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), a
large and rapidly growing proportion of financial companies now operate
globally. Even those operating solely at the national level are confronted with
international competition on a daily basis. Indeed, financial markets can now
be defined as arrangements of closely interlinked subsystems in which a wide
range of assets based on such things as loans, inter-bank credit, real estate,
exchange rates, shares and commodities are created in one country but can be
traded anywhere around the world. Such trading has experienced explosive growth
and profits over recent years.
The United Kingdom – and the City of London in particular –
has benefited greatly from the growth. However, the globalization of the
financial services sector means that decisions made in distant headquarters of
major financial institutions have substantial employment repercussions in their
far-flung subsidiaries. Job reductions by Nomura of Japan, Deutsche Bank of
Germany, UBS and Credit Suisse of Switzerland will impact workers in their
American and British operations, as decisions by American Express, Citigroup,
Bank of America, Morgan Stanley and the UK’s Lloyds TSB Group, RBS, and
Barclays will affect jobs not only in those countries but also in Europe, Asia,
Africa, Latin America, Eastern Europe, etc. It is thus no longer possible to
limit the examination of the employment impact of the crisis on financial
sector workers at a single-country level, as the business and employment
outcomes of managerial decisions extend well beyond the confines of a company’s
home countries.
The Impact of the
Crisis on Financial Services Employment
Not surprisingly, given that the sector has been at the
epicentre of the financial and economic crisis, jobs in financial services
around the world have been strongly affected, with announced layoffs totaling
325,000 between August 2007 and 12 February 2009. These figures almost
certainly understate the real situation, as announcements of job cuts are not
always forthcoming. They are also unlikely to include layoffs from independent
mortgage brokers, other independent contractors who provide subcontracting
services to financial institutions, or the multitude of small financial firms
who would not have had the resources to weather the crisis and may have gone
out of business entirely.
Indeed, press reports indicate that as of mid-2008, major
British banks began to offer their top rates only to customers who approached
them directly, restricting the number and type of mortgages on sale through
brokers. In the United Kingdom, the banks’ decision to deprive brokers of their
best rates has dealt a serious blow to the mortgage broking industry, which
lost 15% of its members between the start of the credit crunch in August 2007
and mid-2008. The number of mortgage advisers had fallen about 30,000 to 26,000
during the same period. Almost three-quarters of the £15 billion in UK mortgages
were previously sold through brokers, according to the UK Council of Mortgage
Lenders. There is a similar trend in the United States, where mortgage brokers
are concerned at attempts by banks to marginalize them, as some of the
country’s largest lenders move to block them from offering loans. Brokers have
long served as an important loan source, typically offering a wider range of
mortgage products from a variety of lending institutions.
The banks argue that their action reflects a move toward
more conservative business practices, but brokers complain that they are being
made scapegoats for the credit crisis, and that consumers will suffer as a
result. Some legislators and consumer advocates have criticized brokers
specializing in subprime mortgages loans typically offered to borrowers with
poor credit-ratings. They charge that some brokers persuaded borrowers to apply
for loans that were beyond their ability to repay. But mortgage brokers say
they have been unfairly blamed for the industry’s failures in recent years.
They point out that it is the lenders, not brokers, who ultimately approve a
borrower’s application.
Human Resource
Management: The Nigerian Case
Decreased oil revenue in the first week of July 2008
Nigeria’s bonny light crude sold for $76.24 and $57 per barrel at the middle of
October and November 2008 respectively and light sweet crude oil. $47.78 on 3rd
December 2008. This represents a dip of about 69.83 percent. Dwindling revenue
affects budgetary performance and allocations to sub sectors because of the
country’s monoculture economy.
Pension payment might become a huge source o worry because
of the dwindling finances to meet up with the financial obligations of
recurrent expenditure. Job cuts, layoffs and increased unemployment have become
the greatest challenge. Associated with this is increased restiveness of labour
unions. Industrial actions, human resource practitioners have a huge challenge
and an opportunity to reinvent Human Resource Management (HRM), engender
increased developmental processes to improve
human behaviours, attitudes and staff relations that will bring about improved productivity, which at the end
put them to be on top of corporate policies for a key to turn around.
The global economic crisis is leading to significant job
losses in the financial sector. From the policy perspective, three different
challenges can be identified, a permanent decline in overall activity and
employment after years of expansion; stagnation and even deceleration in income
growth; and iii) restructuring within
the financial sector as many financial institutions, including whole sectors of
the industry, have disappeared due to mergers and acquisitions, gone out of
business, or changed their operating models.
More fundamentally, the crisis has hit the sector unevenly,
affecting employment in some activities more than in others. In particular,
employment in investment banking has shrunk strongly, while traditional
depository and credit bank activities’ employment has slightly decreased and
employment in funds and trusts has continued to grow. It is likely that further
labour reallocation among financial sub-sectors will occur in the near future.
Two different scenarios are considered: one showing a more
positive picture regarding employment in the sector for the next two years and
the other a more worrying one. However, both scenarios coincide on a slump in
employment expected to take place during the following years. How long these
destructive effects will last is difficult to predict. But whether employment
in the sector approaches the more positive or negative scenario will depend
heavily on the timing and type of policies that governments put in place to
mitigate the effects of the crisis. The following policy recommendations aim at
preparing the ground for a faster recovery of the sector, and bringing it a
positive scenario of employment growth.
Adopting a
Comprehensive Strategy to Respond to the Crisis
The current financial crisis has now become global and
therefore requires a global policy approach. Bail-out plans of the financial
sector, crucial as they are, are insufficient. The world economy is being
affected by a vicious circle of rapidly declining confidence that leads to lower
demand, output and employment, which in turn further depresses confidence. What
is needed is a global, coordinated stimulus package that breaks this vicious
circle and responds to the current problems of failing capital markets,
drying-up of credit and massive job losses.
Such a policy package would to be based on the following broad
principles:
An immediate policy objective is to stabilize the financial
sector and restore confidence to capital markets. In addition, a macroeconomic
stimulus package is needed to boost overall demand, thereby supporting the
economy and job creation. To mitigate the adverse effects of the crisis on
disposable incomes and income inequality, social welfare systems need to be
strengthened and workers’ rights protected. Experience shows that social
dialogue, as part of the Decent Work Agenda, can be instrumental in designing
an effective package of measures.
The massive impact of the crisis for the financial sector
needs to be mitigated by social policies that cushion the adverse effects on
employment and disposable income and help those who lose their jobs in the Such
a policy package would to be based on the following broad principles:
An immediate policy objective is to stabilize the financial
sector and restore confidence to capital markets. In addition, a macroeconomic
stimulus package is needed to boost overall demand, thereby supporting the
economy and job creation. To mitigate the adverse effects of the crisis on
disposable incomes and income inequality, social welfare systems need to be
strengthened and workers’ rights protected. Experience shows that social
dialogue, as part of the Decent Work Agenda, can be instrumental in designing
an effective package of measures. The massive impact of the crisis for the
financial sector needs to be mitigated by social policies that cushion the
adverse effects on employment and disposable income and help those who lose
their jobs in the sector to return quickly to employment.
These measures are essential to stabilize the economy and
thereby also help improve the outlook for the financial sector. In addition,
specific policies targeted towards stabilizing job-creation (Quiggin, 2008),
International Institute for Labour Studies (2008a).
There is widespread recognition that the crisis is partly
due to a variety of practices and instruments in use in recent years and to
irresponsible risktaking in the financial sector. Yet the majority of the
sector’s workers had no role in causing the crisis and need support to find new
jobs, adapt their skills and sometimes embark on a new career. It is therefore
important to adopt measures that:
i) provide
adequate, well-designed unemployment benefits and social protection;
ii)
support job-search and placement into new jobs, which
may sometimes necessitate new skill development measures –all the more
important, because, as noted earlier, the sector is likely to shrink, leading
to a permanent reduction in employment; many job losers will therefore need to
obtain jobs in other sectors;
iii) strengthen
social dialogue within financial institutions to mitigate the adverse social
effects of the crisis and pave the way for a healthier sector;
iv) guarantee
that contractual commitments made vis-à-vis workers are honoured, especially
for those financial enterprises that are forced to leave the market (employees
may have to take legal action to protect their rights at work). In addition, as
discussed later, compensation packages for executive and trading staff will
need to be modified so as to limit rewards for excessive risk-taking.
Policies are needed to ensure that financial sector workers
laid off during the crisis are properly protected against substantial losses of
income. In particular, lower-level employees are unlikely to receive generous
severance payments and will have to rely on unemployment benefits. In some
countries, policies are currently being introduced to extend the maximum
duration of unemployment benefit. As the crisis unfolds, policymakers are urged
to ensure that finance sector employees continue to be appropriately covered
and supported in new job search.
Even those employees – often highly-skilled specialists –
that have contractual guarantees for severance payments are at risk as the
crisis brings down entire financial institutions.
In addition, governments should ensure that finance sector
employees continue to benefit from relevant social services such as health.
Currently, in countries like the United States, health-care insurance is
tightly linked to employment, so there is a higher risk of losing proper health
coverage as well as jobs. In Japan, too, the growing ranks of newly unemployed
temporary or part-time workers have no company-based unemployment benefits to
rely on and there are mounting signs of incidences of extreme poverty.
Unemployment benefits, social protection and employment protection are embedded
in ILO Conventions that many member States have ratified. It is especially
important to apply these conventions in the current context. This will
reinforce automatic stabilizers, thereby supporting economic recovery.
Effective activation policies could play a crucial role in
promoting the reemployment prospects of job losers from the financial sector.
The main elements of these programmes include employment services (such as job
matching, career guidance and job-search support; adequate management of
unemployment benefits; and referral of jobseekers to reintegration programmes
after a period of unsuccessful job search). In certain cases, employment
programmes like direct job creation or subsidized jobs can also play a useful
role –especially to avoid demotivation among job seekers. These programmes, if
well designed, have proved to be very beneficial, helping cushion economic
shocks without jeopardizing growth when the upswing sets in. For example,
universal social policies such as those used by Nordic countries (e.g. Denmark,
Sweden) have encouraged economic development by maintaining high employment and strong labour force
participation while at the same time leading to favourable social outcomes (see
World of Work Report 200822, Chapter 6).
There is a strong case for designing specific training
programmes for unemployed workers from the financial sector who have been
without work for a long period. As already noted, many of these job losers will
have to find a job outside the sector, which may involve acquiring new skills.
Whether government support to the financial sector should
be made conditional on job guarantees or not is a complex issue, which needs to
be addressed taking into account national institutions and practices. However,
supporting some of the existing jobs, at least for a limited period of time,
may be an effective policy. This of course needs to be coordinated with the
policy approach adopted for other sectors –where many innocent victims of the
crisis are also losing their jobs.
Social dialogue is crucial to balance conflicting interests
and is especially important in the context of the crisis. Finance sector
workers may be willing to accept the inevitability of downsizing and
restructuring, and even layoffs. But workers also call for management to inform
and consult their staff or their representatives before drastic decisions are
taken. Moreover, social dialogue can help design training and other programmes
that support job losers and facilitate later recovery of the sector.
The Conclusions of the Tripartite Meeting on the Employment
Impact of Mergers and Acquisitions in the Banking and Financial Services Sector
of February 2001 remain valid in the current crisis. These specified, among
other things, that all possible measures short of terminations, such as
international transfers, restriction of overtime work and reduction of normal
hours of work, should first be considered in case of the need for staff
rationalization.
During crises, when job redundancies become the chosen
measure to contain costs in enterprises to allow them to stay in the market,
several alternatives to lay-offs (early retirement, outsourcing, flexible
staffing and work methods, etc.) exist, with more or less adverse consequences
for the long-term performance of the labour market. In particular, early
retirement programmes that have bee n widespread in the past have proved to be
damaging for both fiscal sustainability and employment prospects among the
elderly. Evidence suggests that gradual retirement policies and measures that help
workers acquire a new career are to be preferred in this respect, as they help
employees to keep in touch with the labour market. Of course, governments may
need to ensure that such measures do not substantially damage the capacity for
these employees to find a more stable form of employment. During the Asian
crisis in Thailand, for example, KTB Securities Company initially retained all
staff, including those from acquired banks, but eventually restructured its
combined operation, introducing incentives to encourage early retirement which
resulted in the departure of 2,372 employees at the taxpayers’ expense, with
long-term adverse consequences for the labour market.
Spain provides another example of the dangers of forced
early retirement. According to the finance sector trade union, jobs in the
banking sector declined from 180,000 to 129,000 between 1980 and December 1999,
mainly due to merger-linked early retirements, sometimes thinly disguised as
voluntary. Under these circumstances, it is recommended that policy measures be
implemented to ensure that banks and financial institutions bear the full costs
of their restructuring activities and are not allowed to increase the
taxpayers’ burden. In particular, measures that cause longterm damage to the proper
functioning of the labour market – such as forced early retirement – should be
avoided
Policies for a more
Effective Finance Sector Serving the Real Economy
Challenges also lie ahead for those employees that continue
to work in the financial services industry. Apart from major restructuring
efforts, existing banks and financial institutions need to concentrate on their
core business. This will require incentives to move towards less risky
activities and avoid
excessive risk taking. This calls for changing corporate
governance of the banking sector, including a fresh look at remuneration
packages of executive and trading staff. In particular, compensation packages
and earnings growth of these employees could better reflect their ability to
fulfill the lending role of the institutions that employ them.
Rewarding risk-taking rather than sustainable growth in
economic value is considered as one of the factors behind the financial crisis.
Indeed the reward system for executives and bank managers needs to be adapted
to prevent excessive risk-taking. The existing remuneration model leads to
misallocation of risk and places burdens on those least capable of taking on
large gambles. In defining appropriate executive compensation packages, experts
recommend that reward must depend on high performance attained through the
right mix between risk-taking and risk management. As part of this approach,
individual incentives would be realigned with the long-term performance of the
enterprise. In this respect, some have argued that such a realignment of
incentives would require abolishing shareholder value as an indicator of
success for the compensation schemes of managers.
They contend that financial institutions, by their very
nature as businesses, are legally obliged to maximize profits for shareholders
and it was up to the government to provide the regulations within which they
operated. There can be no disagreement on this obligation. As is now clear,
however, excessive risk-taking does not necessarily lead to profit
maximization; it may rather lead to total destruction of shareholder value. In
any case, some countries, such as the United Kingdom, have moved in the
direction of requiring that government capital injections come with
restrictions on executive pay and dividend policies. This could be used as a
possible reform approach in other countries. Another policy recommendation is
to redirect executive payments away from short-term cash toward longer term
payments. Withholding a portion of annual compensation depending on performance
goals allows their subsequent adaptation to eventual adverse conditions that
can be clearly linked to previous executive action.
Multi-stakeholder coordination in financial institutions
may be improved to ensure better coordination and implementation of agreed
international corporate governance standards. Remuneration and incentive
systems are supposed to align the interests of corporate officials with the
long-term interest of the enterprise and shareholders. Developments in
corporate governance mechanisms have led to an increasing use of
performancerelated pay systems for executive managers and directors, but
empirical studies show that such systems have little effect, if any, on the
performance of financial institutions. Moreover, wide variations exist, with
examples in some countries displaying virtually no relationship between
performance-related pay and company profits. On the contrary, evidence suggests
that managers are in a dominant wage-bargaining position with respect to
owners, partly as a result of institutional flaws. Distortions in these
structures are dangerous, since they may lead to a short-term bias towards
additional risk-taking, a particular concern for the financial industry.
There have been calls from some quarters for employee
representation in corporate governance, which might help realign the interests
of different stakeholders. Strengthening the role of the enterprise’s board and
allowing other Heineman Jr. (2009). Stake holders to participate can
counterbalance managerial power and may limit excessive risk-taking. This
measure is especially relevant in the finance sector, given the abovementioned
problems of excessive management compensation.
Theoretical Foundation
of Human Resources Management
Several theoretical perspectives have been developed to organize
knowledge of how HR practices are impacted by strategic considerations as
briefly described below. Wright & McMahan (1992) have developed a
comprehensive theoretical framework consisting of six theoretical influences.
Four of these influences provide explanations for practices resulting from
strategy considerations. These include, among others, the resources-based view
of the firm and behavioral view. The two other theories provide explanations
for HR practices that are not driven by strategy considerations: Resource
Dependence and Institutional theory.
The resource-based theory of the firm blends concepts from
organization economics and strategic management Barney (1991).This theory holds
that a firm’s resources are key determinants of its competitive advantage.
Firms can develop these competitive advantages only by creating value in a way
that is difficult for competitors to imitate.
Traditional sources of competitive advantage such as
financial and natural resources, technology and economics of scale can be used
to create value. However, the resource-based argument is that these sources are
increasingly accessible and easy to imitate. Thus they are less significant for
competitive advantage especially in comparison to a complex social structure such
as an employment system. If that is so human resource policies and practices
may be an especially important source of sustained competitive advantage.
Specifically, four empirical indicators of the potential of
firm resources to generate competitive advantage are: value, rareness,
imitability, and substitutability. In other words, to gain competitive
advantage, the resources available to competing firms must be available among
competitors and these resources must be rare. The second theoretical influence
is the behavourial view based on contingency theory. this view explains
practices designed to control and influence attitudes and behaviours, and
stresses the instrumentality of such practices in achieving strategic
objectives. The cybernetic system explains the adoption or abandonment of HR
practices resulting from feedback on contributions to strategy. For example,
training programs may be adopted to help pursue a strategy and would be
subsequently adopted or abandoned based on feedback. The fourth influence,
based on transaction cost explains why organizations use control systems such
as performance evaluation and reward systems. The argument is that in the
absence of performance evaluation systems linked to reward systems, strategies
might not be pursued. The other two theories provide explanations for HR
practices that are not driven by strategy considerations but based on power and
political influences, control of resources and expectations of responsibility.
Conclusion and
Recommendations
The Banking sector is currently undergoing a deep and
thorough restructuring, and the crisis has hit the sector unevenly, which may
result in labour movement among financial sub-sectors. This will reinforce the
impetus towards structural changes similar to those experienced until now.
This restructuring of the finance sector cannot take place
without substantial consequences for both employment and income of current
employees in this industry. In fact, the sector is already experiencing a
permanent decline in overall activity after years of expansion, which is
triggering significant job losses. . Measures that help workers cope with the
crisis in the sector would serve social and economic goals. These include
adequate, well-designed unemployment benefits and social protection, activation
policies and effective public employment services.
They would not only support the income of affected workers,
but also facilitate transition to new jobs and reduce the risk of long-term
unemployment and inactivity. There is also a strong case for launching
retraining programmes targeted on finance sector workers, given the likely cut
in total employment in the sector.
This paper also considers measures that encourage moving
towards a more effective finance sector that focuses on the needs of the real
economy. One of the proposed options is to build incentives that encourage the
sector to shift to less risky activities through an improved corporate
governance structure. This could include rationalizing executive pay and
dividend policies. Social dialogue among employers and trade unions in the
sector can greatly support adoption of effective measures. Human resource
experts are also crucial in ensuring that the measures specific to the sector
are well designed.
References
László, E. (2009) The Advantages of the
Crisis. (In Hungarian) Budapest: Budapest Klub-BKIK workshop, 21 January
Hamvas, B. (1983) The World Crisis. (In Hungarian)
Budapest: Magvető Publisher
Kitchin, J. (1923) "Cycles and
Trends in Economic Factors". Review of Economics and Statistics 5 (1):
10-16
Schumpeter, J. A. (1954) History of
Economic Analysis. London: George Allen & Unwin
Kondratiev, N. D., Oparin, D. I. (1989) Politico-Economics
Booklets. (In
Hungarian) Budapest: Training and Information Centre of
PoliticoEconomics Teachers
Szegő, I. M. (2008) Crisis or Permanent Wave. Origo.hu. 25
September
2008 http://www.origo.hu/uzletinegyed/valsag/20080924-valsaghullamvagy- trend-kondratyev-kitchen-juglarciklusok-es-azevszazados.html,
2 February
Kaposi, Z. (1997) Economic History. (In
Hungarian) Pécs: Janus Pannonius University
Honvári, J. (2001) (ed.) The Economic
History of Hungary from the Settlement to the Middle of the 20th Century. (In Hungarian) Budapest: Aula
Publisher
Courtney (2001) 20/20 Foresight.
Crafting Strategy in an Uncertain World. Boston: Harvard Business School Press
Bryan, L. (2008) Leading through
Uncertainity. The McKinsey Quarterly, December.
http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com
IMF (2008) IMF Crisis Forecast – Should
We Laugh or Cry? (In Hungarian) Világgazdaság-Online, 15 December. cited by:
Farkas, P.
(2009) How Long does it Take Downhill
for the Global Economy? Népszabadság-Weekend, 1 August, p. 1 and p. 5
Sveiby, K. E. (2001) The New Wealthof
Organisations: Managed Knowledge. (In Hungarian) Budapest: KJK-Kerszöv Jogi és
Üzleti Publisher
Vajkai, A. and Fodor, P. (2008) The
Relevance of Infocom Technologies on Knowledge-Management in the Public Sector:
The Hungarian case. In: Harorimana D., Watkins D. (eds.): Proceedings of the
9th European Conference on Knowledge-Management. Academic
Publishing Limited. Reading, pp. 887-894
Hámori, Sz. (2009) Companies Beware of
Human Sacrifice (In Hungarian) Népszabadság, 6 January, p. 20
Boda, Gy. (2006) Without the Management
of Intellectual Capital there is No Efficient Cost Management. In: Noszkay, E.
(ed.) Catching the intangibles. (In Hungarian) Budapest: N. & B. Publisher
Rumelt, R., P., (2008) Strategy in a
‘Structural Break’. McKinsey Quarterly, December
Tomka, J. (2009) Shared Knowledge is
Power. (In Hungarian) Budapest: Harmat Publisher
Salojärvi, S., Furu, P., Sveiby, K. E.
(2005) Knowledge-Management and Growth in Finnish SMEs (In Hungarian) Journal
of Knowledge Management, pp. 1-9
Barrett, C. W., Musso, C. S., Padhi A.
(2009): Upgrading R&D in a downturn. The McKinsey
Quarterly. http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/
Upgrading_RD_in_a_downturn_2302, March 23
GKI Research (2009) Employment Practice of Large Firms in
Light of
Financial and Economic Crisis (in Hungarian) Labour Review
Newsletter (Munkaügyi
Szemle Hírlevele),
http://www.munkaugyiszemle.hu/#12 February 10
Balázs, Gy., Veres R. (2009) HR
Challenges and Solution in Light HR Challenges and Solutions. Within Financial
and Economic Crisis. (in
Hungarian)
Hewitt Human Consulting
Co.,
http://www.ccifh.hu/fileadmin/template/hongrie/
documents/DRH/Valsag_hatasok_2009_jan_20.pdf February 20
HayGroup (2009) Headcount-Cutting and Salary Freezing in
2009
Világgazdaság Online,
http://vg.hu/index.php?apps=cikk&cikk=253223,
February 15
Lengyel, Cs., Pingitzer, A., László, J.
(2006) Summarising Study on Hungarian Knowledge-Management Survey. in: Noszkay
E.(ed.) Catching the Intangibles. (In Hungarian) Budapest: N. & B.
Publisher
Brewster, C., Wood, G., Brookes, M., Van
Ommeren, J. (2006) ‘What Determines the Size of the HR Function? A
cross-national Analysis. Human Resource Management, 1, pp. 3-21
[1]
Mrs. Andah is a Lecturer at the Department of Business Administration, Nasarawa
State University, Keffi-Nigeria.
[2]
Mrs. Kwon-Dung is a Lecturer at the Department of Business Administration,
Nasarawa State University, Keffi-Nigeria.
[3] Mrs. Bature is a Lecturer
at the Department of Business Administration, University of Abuja-Nigeria.
No comments